A group of around twenty people brought together by a love of gardens and the phenomenon known as Twitter were welcomed to The Laskett by the head gardener. The introduction was, in some respects, an apology. an apology for all the shortcomings of the gardens we were about to see: That it had been designed and built in stages on a tight budget: That there were only two gardeners working four days a week; That it was changing – implying that the owners weren’t necessarily happy with it; It was almost as if he was saying don’t expect too much of this garden – this of course after we had all paid our £10 entrance fee!
So were these fears well founded? Almost all of our group were disappointed and were vocal in their views about how crowded, unkempt and frankly messy the gardens were. The planting seemed ill considered with the strangest of planting combinations, where one type of plant would have sufficed there were five. The wide and varied use of predominantly cheap materials seemed to spoil great swathes of the garden and more statues than you might expect to find in any museum.
- Faded blue arch with struggling climber
- Large cedar at The Laskett
- The Yew Garden at The Laskett
- Simplification here would be good
- Way too much going on
- Statue called The Gardener in the Kitchen Garden
The lack of unity, the bringing together of ideas, forms, colours was evident in abundance. There was no coherence or glue in which to hold the assembled array of plants and materials together to provide anything substantial or memorable.
But perhaps this is to miss the point of this garden?
It strikes me that it is a very personal space. One created by a husband and wife team of Sir Roy Strong and his late wife Julia. It is a garden of experimentation, one that is evolving and changing, one that celebrates the life and achievements in a way that evokes emotion.
- This nearly works!
- Too many focal points distract the eye
- Covent Garden
- Covent Garden
- Hilliard Garden
- Elizabeth Tudor Avenue and crowned column
As a garden designer, one of the key things that I try to achieve is to bring out the clients personality in their garden. I am told that I achieve this well. To do this in my own garden however I find very much more challenging – the point that I am seeking help and guidance from John Brookes. The point I am making here is that to design your own garden is not an easy task for anyone, even if like Lady Strong you have a design background (albeit that her forte was stage set design).
- The Stag
- Will someone please explain this to me?
- Mixed planting
- The Stag
- Box balls at base of tree – sadly there were also two large spherical objects just out of view which ruined this
Whilst the garden may leave many puzzled and disappointed the garden wasn’t created for them. I applaud the fact that they have achieved something that is so personal but from a garden design perspective most of it left me cold. There was too much incongruity and an overwhelming feeling bought about by the volume of planting and statuary. For me less would have been more. Not a garden I will rush to see again but equally I’m glad that I have seen it, as much to remind me what not to do. For some however the cost has left a bitter taste that a garden that is open to the public should be so far from excellent.
I’d love to hear your views if you have been to the gardens, feel free to leave a comment.
Tags: development · garden design · gardening · imagination · Inspiration · lifestyle · Plant5 Comments





























































